The READIN Family Album
Me and a frog (August 30, 2004)

READIN

Jeremy's journal

Liberty is not a woman walking the streets, she is not sitting on a bench waiting for an invitation to dinner, to come sleep in our bed for the rest of her life.

José Saramago


(This is a page from my archives)
Front page
More recent posts
Older posts
More posts about:
The Chronicles of Narnia
Children's Books
Readings
The Movies
Sylvia

Archives index
Subscribe to RSS

This page renders best in Firefox (or Safari, or Chrome)

🦋 Another Narnia movie

Sylvia and I saw Prince Caspian tonight -- we enjoyed it and I would recommend it to people who are fans of the books. I don't think I'd recommend it as a movie to somebody who is not predisposed to like it; I guess my reaction to it was a little bit like Ebert's reaction to the latest Indiana Jones movie.

Good things: the talking animals, great; Trumpkin, great; the beautiful scenery and handsome actors were candy for my eyes. The camera work in the opening sequence was really startlingly good. Not so good: There wasn't really anything to distinguish this movie as a different film from the previous one -- where the two books are quite distinct from one another. A lot of the battle footage in particular, which made up a huge proporiton of the film, seemed like it could easily just have been lifted out of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.

Sylvia had a good time identifying the differences between the movie and the book, which I guess means the movie was faithful enough to the book, for them to stand out.

posted evening of Sunday, May 25th, 2008
➳ More posts about The Chronicles of Narnia
➳ More posts about Children's Books
➳ More posts about Readings
➳ More posts about The Movies
➳ More posts about Sylvia

My girlfriend was spitting mad about the changes made to the story, which is one of her favorites; having reread the book (it is short) I think I agree. All the characters are much coarser than in the book. And the book includes a (very decorous) Bacchanal--this got entirely lost in the film. On the other hand, I think the animators did a great job with Reepicheep, who I think is as well realized as any of the Warner Brothers golden age characters.

posted evening of May 25th, 2008 by Randolph Fritz

the characters are much coarser than in the book

But this is equally true of the previous film, right? I mean Disney can generally be counted on to turn novels into cartoons. I guess I went in expecting this so did not find it disappointing.

(very decorous) Bacchanal

Hm, this has escaped my memory.

posted morning of May 26th, 2008 by Jeremy

Respond:

Name:
E-mail:
(will not be displayed)
Link:
Remember info

Drop me a line! or, sign my Guestbook.
    •
Check out Ellen's writing at Patch.com.

What's of interest:

(Other links of interest at my Google+ page. It's recommended!)

Where to go from here...

Friends and Family
Programming
Texts
Music
Woodworking
Comix
Blogs
South Orange
readinsinglepost