The READIN Family Album
Me and Sylvia at the Memorial (April 2009)

READIN

Jeremy's journal

Improvement makes straight roads; but the crooked roads without improvement are roads of genius.

— William Blake


(This is a page from my archives)
Front page
More recent posts
Older posts
More posts about:
Cover Versions
Music

Archives index
Subscribe to RSS

This page renders best in Firefox (or Safari, or Chrome)

🦋 Cover versions

Over at Before You Listen, NickS is asking, "What makes a good cover?" Well -- I've been thinking about it some and the more I reflect, the more it seems like I'm a really easy target for cover versions in general. This came to me today when I was listening to WFUV's Sunday Breakfast, and Alison Kraus came on the radio singing Dolly Parton's "9 to 5" -- this is just fantastic! and what is it about cover versions that gets me so reliably interested?

I think it's pretty simple really: When I listen to a cover of a song I like, I've got the version I know playing in my head and the version I'm listening to playing harmony. Lots of opportunities for interplay between the variations, a psychic duet between the two singers. Fun! Even better, when I get to know multiple versions and have them all playing together. (Take a look at this list of covers of "Summertime Blues" -- some great stuff in there. I guess The Who's version and Eddie Cochran's are the two most familiar to me; Blue Cheer's, which I heard for the first time yesterday, is totally worth while. Plus T. Rex! Richie Valens! Bruce! James Taylor! and many more. A couple of versions below the fold.)

(Note: Doing a clumsy post like this makes me grateful for the existence of bloggers like NickS who can write meaningful, articulate takes on what is happening in the music they're listening to.)

posted morning of Sunday, August 31st, 2008
➳ More posts about Cover Versions
➳ More posts about Music

Nice examples.

You ask "what is it about cover versions that gets me so reliably interested?" I think the answer, which you suggest in your post, is that it give an opportunity to try to separate the song from a performance. It makes it easier to abstract out performance (or songwriting) decisions because it gives you an example of other decisions that could be made.

Also, I liked the second cover and looking it up lead me to this cool thread.

How well would you have to know someone's work to pick out your five least favorite moments? That suggests a level of dedication.

(and, I have to agree, his solo isn't memorable).

posted morning of August 31st, 2008 by NickS

Oh yeah -- on re-listening, that's true. I was listening to it before more as a Simple Minds performance; I don't think I even knew who Johnny Marr was until I looked him up on Wikipædia just now.

posted morning of August 31st, 2008 by Jeremy

abstract out performance decisions

This is an interesting take on what I wrote about a "psychic duet" -- my first reaction was to think No, I don't want to abstract out the performance decisions, it's the individual performances that are key to how I'm listening to the song. But thinking about it more, I am reacting to this sort of as if you had said you have a Platonic ideal of "9 to 5"on another plane, that the two performances by Dolly and by Alison are emulating in our reality -- by listening to the two versions together in my head I can begin to approach the ideal.

Now I don't think that's how reality works -- and I'm pretty sure that's not quite what you're saying -- but it does make for some nice imagery.

posted afternoon of August 31st, 2008 by Jeremy

Respond:

Name:
E-mail:
(will not be displayed)
Link:
Remember info

Drop me a line! or, sign my Guestbook.
    •
Check out Ellen's writing at Patch.com.

What's of interest:

(Other links of interest at my Google+ page. It's recommended!)

Where to go from here...

Friends and Family
Programming
Texts
Music
Woodworking
Comix
Blogs
South Orange
readinsinglepost